Comments on: The Killing: Soaking Wet http://www.screencuisine.net/screencuisine/television/the-killing-soaking-wet/ Movies, TV, Internet, Video Games, and E-Books Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:05:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: MartinJ http://www.screencuisine.net/screencuisine/television/the-killing-soaking-wet/#comment-3558 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:55:09 +0000 http://www.screencuisine.net/?p=811#comment-3558 Well that was fucking stupid. Sorry but it was. I don’t think I was ever as disappointed by a TV series finale. (LOST doesn’t count – I stopped watching that after episode what, 7?)

]]>
By: Christopher http://www.screencuisine.net/screencuisine/television/the-killing-soaking-wet/#comment-3552 Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:39:53 +0000 http://www.screencuisine.net/?p=811#comment-3552 A commenter over at the AV Club (where pretty much everyone is pissed about the finale) speculated that maybe Holder was being coerced to bring down MMC (Richmond). A couple episodes ago, he called his family and no one picked up, so the commenter thinks maybe they were abducted and being held to force Holder to fabricate evidence against Richmond. But, jeez, we’re just talking about a mayoral election — kidnapping just doesn’t seem like the kind of thing you’d do just to continue to be the mayor. Plus, once you let the family go, you go to jail for the rest of your life. So I don’t imagine it’s true.

]]>
By: Tom Francis http://www.screencuisine.net/screencuisine/television/the-killing-soaking-wet/#comment-3549 Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:12:57 +0000 http://www.screencuisine.net/?p=811#comment-3549 Yeah, I found it only really left one question unanswered:

ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?

After 12 hours of red herrings to desperately delay the climax of the case to the climax of the season, they’re deferring it to another next season? I was sticking with it to see whether a series-long murder investigation could work, even after it became clear it probably wouldn’t, but now I don’t even get to know that.

The only way I can make sense of the decision to dodge the closure the series has been building towards is that maybe they think we bought Mr Mayoral Candidate as the killer. That way, I guess, you’d half-feel you were getting the closure for the brief period between that conclusion being shoved in your face and the inevitable revelation that it was spurious.

To me, though, the more they piled on the evidence that MMC (I completely forget his name for some reason) was Orpheus, the more obvious it got that Orpheus would not be the killer. In fact, the more obvious it got that you were right about Gwen. By the time they show a shot of MMC shouting “You know I’m telling the truth!” to the police while Gwen looks worried in the foreground, it’s pretty hard to ignore. Which makes it painful that the cops don’t even suspect her before the series finishes.

Holder’s fake evidence has to be a political play, on behalf of the mayor, probably in exchange for something that helps his [young relative]. Holder has to know the evidence won’t hold up, so the only effect is for MMC to be publicly shamed before the election rather than after. I assume Holder minds less because he’s sure MMC is guilty. I don’t know how he plans to explain how he got the fake evidence after it’s discovered, maybe the reward is enough that he doesn’t care.

I guess I’ll watch the first episode of the next season to see how long they plan to drag it out, but they’ve left me with no reason to bear with any future plotlines they introduce.

]]>
By: Christopher http://www.screencuisine.net/screencuisine/television/the-killing-soaking-wet/#comment-3538 Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:21:17 +0000 http://www.screencuisine.net/?p=811#comment-3538 In reply to Jacquilynne.

Yeah, good point, and that’s why this feels somewhat like it’s a cheat and a disappointment. Blah.

]]>
By: Jacquilynne http://www.screencuisine.net/screencuisine/television/the-killing-soaking-wet/#comment-3537 Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:08:41 +0000 http://www.screencuisine.net/?p=811#comment-3537 I think season-crossing cliffhangers really only work (and by work I mean ‘don’t annoy me’) when the entire season hasn’t been focused on whatever the cliffhanger is also about.

So, mystery of the week season finale plot that ends up with the heroes in jeopardy and is resolved first episode back is fine. So is a season long arc that wraps up and then teases the next season by showing the crime that’s going to be the focus of that season happening. Or for those hybrid shows that have multi-season arcs as well as mystery of the weeks, you can leave your long arc on a cliffhanger as long as it’s primarily been B story to the mysteries of the week.

But if you spent a whole season leading up to the conclusion of some investigation and then you don’t conclude it I WILL WANT TO CUT YOU.

]]>